
Ive been a fan of the comics since I was a kid and my bro brought home the first Archie's and Phantoms. Tintin series by Herge was a special favorite though... we'd actually save up and try collect the entire series. It got ridiculous to the level where we'd actually gift them to each other on birthdays.. often thumbed through :) We even named our first dog Snowy!
So when so many years later i am handed the book The Adventures of Tintin: Breaking Free, i am left with mixed feelings. Ole intelligent and good hearted Tintin of the yore is suddenly rehashed into a constantly angry looking proletariat who mouthes cuss words like theres no tomorrow and is the first to table the notion of violent revolution! And Captain Haddock, the grumpy unmarried marine of Herges now has a wife and kid and is the leader of the labour population!
Well i guess it would suffice to say that it took me more than sometime to deal with this initial shock of the complete contradiction in the characters. All that was similar was limited to the looks. So my first reaction was indignation.. i was appalled to have some of my favorite comic characters completely dismembered in character. As i read on though i stopped trying to draw parallels, got past my indignation and began to see the themes the comic was trying to portray. It takes one across a full spectrum of the building of a proletariat revolution... it tries to encompass issues of gender, sexual orientation,labour and class. Trying to constantly push the idea of uniting against injustice and prejudice. By the end of it, i didnt really mind it so much but i must admit that i wasnt blown away to bits either.
As one of my favorite cartoonist Bill Watterson has again and again reiterated and shown, comics are a wonderful and extremely potent medium for ideas and information. This one tries to use it with that understanding yet somehow i find that its need to be radical comes across to me at many points as so forced that it takes away from the many very interesting and meaningful messages and situations it wishes to share. For me the only point i see in using Tintin and Captain as images here is for (a)shock value (b)to take otherwise bourgeois characters and turn them prol as a symbol of protest. I'd say point (a) is the emphasised one unfortunately. I would even hesitate to see Haddock as a bourgeois for while he was well off, in the series Tintin and he constantly side with the weaker sections of the populace (like when Haddock against everyones wishes decides to house the Roma gypsies in his land instead of letting them live in the government alloted space near a dump in Castafiore Emerald). Frankly i would have valued the book more if it had stuck to making its own characters than trying to attract readers through the glossy misleading characterisation of Tintin in this comic.
Final verdict though- worth a read for the effort and ideas it tries to portray- not so much for the sense of slight betrayal one feels at the complete pummeling of old Herges comic characters.



